Archive for May, 2010

The sheep and the shepherd (John 10:16)

May 27, 2010

Reference: John 10:16

We know who the shepherd is, the question here is "who's in the flock?"

What does Jesus mean in John 10:16 when he says ” one on one” – does he mean that he guides each one us one on one?

Actually this passage has nothing to do with the manner in which Jesus leads/guides us.  Rather he is speaking specifically about salvation and who receives it.  Jesus does not say that the shepherd leads us “one on one” he says that there is “one flock and one shepherd”.   A flock consists of many sheep, not just one.  It would have been different if he had said there is one sheep and one shepherd.  But he is saying that there is one “flock”, i.e. many sheep.

The significance of this ONE flock lies in the beginning of the verse.  Jesus says that he has “other” sheep.  He is referring to the Gentiles, those outside the Jewish faith.  He suggests here that he will go and get them as well, and through the gate (Jesus), they too will receive salvation.  This is a very radical statement because during Jesus’ time there was great separation between the Jews and the Gentiles.  Yet here he says they will both be a part of the ‘one flock’.

Jesus reminds us that even the people we least suspect are welcome into his flock.  It doesn’t matter if they come from a different culture, a different system of beliefs, or if they look or act a certain way.  But here he also reminds us that those who will pass through the gate must “listen to his voice.”  Many do not.

How did Saul die? (two differing accounts)

May 27, 2010

Reference: 1 Samuel 31:4, 2 Samuel 1:6-10

King Saul commits suicide.

In 2 Samuel a man came to David claiming that he killed Saul in which David then killed the man because he admitted to killing the anointed one. Previously in 1 Samuel 31-4 when his armor bearer wouldn’t kill Saul, Saul killed himself by falling on his sword. Why the discrepancy?

Here we have another issue of a conflict within scripture.  This is not uncommon nor does it give reason to discredit the bible.  Often times there are good explanations for biblical discrepancy, sometimes it is impossible to know for sure.  Some scholars may try to harmonize multiple accounts, i.e. they try to explain the problem in a way that makes both accounts work.  This can be like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

In the case of Saul’s death, there have been attempts to harmonize the account that says Saul committed suicide, and the account in which the Amalekite says that he killed the King. Obviously, Saul could not have both committed suicide and been killed by the Amalekite.

I think that the explanation for the discrepancy can be as simple as saying that the Amalekite lied.  This would not be much of a stretch considering that he brought the information to the (soon-to-be) king of Israel, David.  The ruse may have been an attempt to gain favor from Saul’s arch nemesis David.  Little did he know that David still bore great respect for Saul because he was God’s anointed king.  The Amalekite must have been very surprised when David had him killed for saying that he murdered Israel’s king.

In the 2 Samuel 1 account, note also that it does not say what happened to Saul, it only tells us what the Amalekite said happened.  This is different from the 1 Samuel 31 account in which the narrator simply spells out exactly what happened.  If you read 2 Samuel 4:10 you will see that even David himself does not say that the Amalekite killed Saul.  Rather, David says he killed the Amalekite because of what he said. Thus, it is much more likely that the account of Saul’s suicide in 1 Samuel 31 is the actual account of his death.  Furthermore, there is really no disunity in the two accounts, since one of the accounts is likely a lie told by an enemy of Israel.